Skip to main content

Boo!


The house above is Abbey House, Cambridge. It is the oldest inhabited residential building in Cambridge, and also, reputedly, the most haunted. My brother Murray was involved in restoring it a few years ago and for a few months lived in it. On several occasions he had encounters with some of the house's non corporeal inhabitants, as did all of the members of his building crew. Some heard music playing late at night. Some saw a white woman, a small dog and/or a disembodied head moving eerily around the house. Some had encounters with objects which moved on their own, or lights which turned on and off independently of the switches. Some found it interesting. Many found it very scary indeed. Today Murray showed us around the house, and we saw none of that spooky stuff. We just saw a lovely old building with a somewhat random floor plan and floors and ceilings which are never, but never quite plumb. There is an old bakery and a wonderful six seater long drop toilet. It is all set in a very gracious and very large garden and it is home to a semi monastic Buddhist community.

It was interesting to see Abbey House so soon after visiting the cell of Julian of Norwich. Everyone who visits Mother Julian's cell comments on the spiritual atmosphere of her small room. I have been wondering what it is that makes one place feel holy, and another place feel as though it is full of malevolent presences. Is it a matter of subjective impressions or is there really some sort of independently existing psychic residue left in a place that can be sensed by subsequent visitors? I can appreciate that the physical dimensions and proportions of a building can have a strong emotional impact on people. We went to evensong in the chapel of Kings College Cambridge today, for example, and were bowled over by all that space enclosed in glass and a tracery of stone; the building is designed to do precisely that. But Mother Julian's cell is just a small oblong room with no real distinguishing features. Why should it affect people so?

Some of it is expectation and memory. We expect to be inspired by Julian or to be frightened by Abbey House, so we are. We remember the Revelations of divine Love or the spooky stories and they colour how we perceive the space but this doesn't explain the members of Murray's company who didn't previously know of the house's reputation but nevertheless experienced some wierd things. It doesn't explain one other odd phenomenon. The members of the community who inhabit Abbey House, are, by and large, completely unafraid of the ghosts. There is even some affection for them and a hope that they will find resolutions to whatever conflicts there are which bind them to this old house. As the level of fear surrounding the ghosts has decreased, so has the ghostly activity.

My own opinion is that there can be a sort of psychic imprint left on a place by previous events. In a house as old as Abbey house, the events the house has hosted will be large in number, and some of them will have been traumatic. There has built up, over the years, a sort of shadow connected with these events. Conversely, the tiny room beside St. Julian's church was home to a very strong consciousness who had more than the usual reserves of stillness and of good will towards her fellows. She was a prayerful woman, and after her death many other prayerful people visited that site to sit, and worship and wish their fellows well. The shadow of all this good will and spiritual intention remains as well. The positive (for want of a better word) energy of Mother Julian's cell thus multiplies and grows as people are inspired by it and add to it. It seems that the negative (for want of a better word) energies of Abbey House are frightening to many people, and the fear in turn adds to the shadow which hangs over the place. When there is no fear, and where people are focused on wholeness and purposeful about attaining it, the shadow begins to lighten until (who knows?) it disappears altogether.

In the end, it's impossible to really know the extent to which the responses to these two interesting places are based on some level of objectively real presence which adheres to the places themselves or whether the responses are entirely subjective phenomena located in the minds of the observers. It's unknowable and also perhaps irrelevant beside another great truth which these buildings demonstrate to be true, whether or not the phenomena of these places is entirely subjective or not: it seems that perfect love really does cast out all fear. That in absolute reality... neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:38-39)

Comments

Alden Smith said…
This post reminded me of two ideas.

The first is a book by M.Scott Peck of 'The Road Less Travelled" fame who in his book "In Search of Stones" talks about how when trapsing all over England to view dolmens, historical ruins and megalithic monuments of one kind or another, he experienced very real differences in atmosphere at all of these sites. I think his judgement was that what was operating was not so much an objective principal of archaeology, rather a subjective one of the soul.

The other idea I was reminded of was a Maori concept I remember being told about. It relates to what is called the "Reo" of a particular place. "Reo" is how the word sounds. I am not sure of the spelling and can't find it in my Maori Dictionary. The word refers to the fact that each geographic location in Aotearoa New Zealand has a particular flavour or essence that is hard to define in words. Rather it is more able to be sensed and appreciated when there. It is a reference not only to our 5 senses but also to intangible things beyond these which when combined give us the sense of the geographic location and / or surrounding areas 'Reo'.
Dan Gurney said…
I'm glad to know you're with your brother, Murray. I hope you'll continue your dialogue regarding Buddhism and Christianity and post about it here.

About hauntings... in my neighborhood 30 years ago there was a murder-suicide.

After the crime, the house was cleaned up and sold to new owners. The new owners (who were not aware of the history of the crime in their house) reported odd and unexplainable occurrences like cupboard doors slamming shut and matchbooks spontaneously blazing. When these new owners learned of the house's history, they moved out and put the house up for sale.

The current owner, who was apprised of both the crimes and the spooky events, has reported no further occurrences. He does not seem particularly afraid of ghosts, and as in Murray's case, the ghosts seem to have moved on.
Kelvin Wright said…
The concept of the reo or the wairua of a place is one I like because it is truthful. Some places feel good and others don't and it is consistent: everyone who visits the spots feels the same way. Perhaps in some cases it is an aesthetic thing: the old fibonacci sequence again. Murray's take on Abbey house is that the presences are beings consumed by their cravings and unable to separate from the house for some reason. He thinks that some are some kind of entity which feeds on fear; they do spooky things and then somehow consume the energy generated by the freaked out observers. I tend to think that they are not conscious; they are too limited, too repetitive. I find them fascinating and would dearly love to see some of them, but of course with that sort of attitude I am among the least likely to encounter them.

The encounter with Buddhism continues and sometime we will need to address the great sticking point: the possibility of an independently existing creator, but it is nearly as fascinating as the ghosts to observe the parallels between the Anglican church and the Western Buddhist Order: a Buddhist group which developed in England and has found a Buddhism almost as English as Devonshire teas.
Alden Smith said…
There is something ironic about wishing two Kiwis the best of British luck in their philosophical / religous discussions, but I do so non-the-less.
Dan Gurney said…
Buddhism tends to acquire flavorings from culture in which it resides. Buddhism in Japan feels Japanese; Buddhism in Burma feels Burmese; Buddhism in England feels English, and so on.

Here in California's wine country, Buddhism has a distinctly California feel, though I wouldn't go so far as to call it Zin(fandel) Buddhism.
Anonymous said…
You hurry up and come back safe to us soon, Fr K - we all miss you both. (Clemency, could you not stuff some of that there tapestry in your reticule for a souvenir on the grounds of it being a family heirloom and all - along with the stone fountains I ordered a couple of weeks ago from Spain?) But in the meantime, I'll take my cue from Dan in California - and work on my piNot BuddhiZm...
Jo F

Popular posts from this blog

Camino, by David Whyte

This poem captures it perfectly Camino. The way forward, the way between things, the way already walked before you, the path disappearing and re-appearing even as the ground gave way beneath you, the grief apparent only in the moment of forgetting, then the river, the mountain, the lifting song of the Sky Lark inviting you over the rain filled pass when your legs had given up, and after, it would be dusk and the half-lit villages in evening light; other people's homes glimpsed through lighted windows and inside, other people's lives; your own home you had left crowding your memory as you looked to see a child playing or a mother moving from one side of a room to another, your eyes wet with the keen cold wind of Navarre. But your loss brought you here to walk under one name and one name only, and to find the guise under which all loss can live; remember you were given that name every day along the way, remember you were greeted as such, and you neede

En Hakkore

In the hills up behind Ranfurly there used to be a town, Hamilton, which at one stage was home to 5,000 people. All that remains of it now is a graveyard, fenced off and baking in the lonely brown hills. Near it, in the 1930s a large Sanitorium was built for the treatment of tuberculosis and other respiratory ailments. It was a substantial complex of buildings with wards, a nurses hostel, impressive houses for the manager and superintendent and all the utility buildings needed for such a large operation. The treatment offered consisted of isolation, views and weather. Patients were exposed to the air, the tons of it which whistled past, often at great speed, the warmth of the sun and the cold. They were housed in small cubicles opening onto huge glassed verandas where they cooked in the summer and froze in the winter and often, what with the wholesome food and the exercise, got better. When advances in antibiotics rendered the Sanitorium obsolete it was turned into a Borstal and the

Kindle

 Living as I do in a place where most books have to come a long way in an aeroplane, reading is an expensive addiction, and of course there is always the problem of shelf space. I have about 50 metres of shelving in my new study, but it is already full and there is not a lot of wall space left; and although it is great insulation, what is eventually going to happen to all that paper? I doubt my kids will want to fill their homes with old theological works, so most of my library is eventually going to end up as egg cartons. Ebooks are one solution to book cost and storage issues so I have been  using them for a while now, but their big problem has been finding suitable hardware to read them on.  I first read them on the tiny screens of Ipaqs and they were quite satisfactory but the wretchedness of Microsoft Reader and its somewhat arbitrary copyright protection system killed the experience entirely. On Palm devices they were OK except the plethora of competing and incompatible formats

Ko Tangata Tiriti Ahau

    The Christmas before last our kids gave us Ancestry.com kits. You know the deal: you spit into a test tube, send it over to Ireland, and in a month or so you get a wadge of paper in the mail telling you who you are. I've never, previously, been interested in all that stuff. I knew my forbears came to Aotearoa in the 1850's from Britain but I didn't know from where, exactly. Clemency's results, as it turns out, were pretty interesting. She was born in England, but has ancestors from various European places, and some who are Ngāti Raukawa, so she can whakapapa back to a little marae called Kikopiri, near Ōtaki. And me? It turns out I'm more British than most British people. Apart from a smattering of Norse  - probably the result of some Viking raid in the dim distant past - all my tūpuna seem to have come from a little group of villages in Nottinghamshire.  Now I've been to the UK a few times, and I quite like it, but it's not home: my heart and soul belon

Return to Middle Earth

 We had a flood, a couple of weeks back, and had to move all the stuff out of the spare bedroom, including  the contents of two floor to ceiling book cases. Shoving the long unopened copies of Sartor Resartus and An Introduction to Byron into cartons, I came upon my  copy of The Lord of the Rings . Written in the flyleaf are the dates of its many readings, the last one being when I read it aloud to Catherine, when she was about 10 or 11, well over 20 years ago. The journey across Middle Earth took Catherine and me the best part of a year, except for the evening when we followed Frodo and Sam across the last stretches of Mordor and up Mount Doom, when we simply couldn't stop, and sat up reading until 11.00 pm, on a school night.  My old copy is a paperback, the same edition that every card carrying baby boomer has somewhere on their shelves. The glue has dried and hardened. The cover and many of the pages have come loose. I was overcome with the urge to read it again, but this old