Skip to main content

Teaching Theology to Children

Chaplain and students of St. Hilda's discussing mortality and history

There's quite a bit of discussion in our Anglican schools about how you teach Religious subjects to children. It used to be a matter of preparing children for confirmation and making them all into good little Anglicans, but things are no longer quite so simple. Whereas once our schools were filled, by and large, with kids from Anglican homes who had a basic Sunday School understanding of the faith and a local parish church with which they could readily identify, pupils like that are now more the exception than the rule. In most schools,  parents sending their children have signed a statement that they are supportive of the school's special character, but what, exactly, "supportive" means varies widely - from deep and long-standing commitment to the faith, through the spectrum to vague agreement that perhaps a little bit of this religious stuff may not be such a bad thing. 

In our schools the students, parents, school boards and staff vary as widely in their religious beliefs and practices as does the rest of New Zealand society but our schools' very reason for existence is the providing of an education that has "special character", that is, it is based on Anglican Christianity. Each school deals with this dilemma in a different way, providing a unique blend of chapel worship, service projects and religious instruction that fits itself around a demanding academic curriculum and, in most cases, a weighty programme of cultural, social and sporting activities. 

The aims of the Religious Education (RE) component of the school's life also varies from school to school. In some there is a definite evangelical or catechetical agenda aimed at the conversion of pupils and their incorporation in the body of Christ. For some  there is a broader academic teaching of religious studies which deals with the variety of religious understanding as one subject amongst many others. In some schools what is provided is Bible study, little different from what may be found in our remaining Sunday Schools and Youth Groups. Some chaplains and RE teachers forge their own amalgam of these components. In  many of our schools the Christian faith is regarded as central to the school's life, but elsewhere it is more peripheral. Because it is not an examined subject and doesn't count towards NCEA, there is a temptation to give it the fag end of timetabling slots and it can be regarded by students and staff alike as a sort of spare space if time needs to be poached for extra studies, or something more important such as a sporting fixture. The teaching of RE, in other words, seems to have the same sorts of problems as are faced by our declining churches throughout the country.

But although our churches are declining, and although our school RE sometimes seems gripped by an identity crisis, there is something that has never dimmed, and that is people's fascination with religious questions. Start a discussion on ghosts, or life after death, or fate, or ESP, or synchronicity, or any of the other popular manifestations of the supernatural and all other conversations in the room cease and people gather round. The great questions of life: Why is there something rather than nothing? Why am I here? Where am I going? Is the world accidental or purposed? are as compelling as ever. And this ongoing fascination with life's big issues is why our Anglican Schools Office, in partnership with the Presbyterian Church is in the process of developing a curriculum for teaching theology in the middle school , that is to years 6-9. 

The curriculum began with a widespread survey of pupils, asking them for the questions they would like discussed. The sorts of question they came up with was not surprising. The enthusiasm with which they responded to the survey was. Based on the questions provided by students a group of chaplains, theologians and and RE teachers met and devised a curriculum of, to date, 16 subjects (for example, Is anybody Out There? What Makes Me "Me"? How Do I Listen to God?  How Do I Know What is True?... ) around each of which a teaching unit of 7-10 lessons is being written. About half a dozen of the units have been developed to the stage where they can be used and a dozen or so schools are trialing the curriculum.

The results so far have been extraordinary. Teachers are reporting that children are engaged with RE in a way they have never been before. I spoke today to a chaplain who has been in her job for only a short time, but for whom the whole attitude of the senior school has been transformed towards RE, chapel, and even towards life in general by the theology lessons. A few months ago I sat in on an RE class and watched as the boys tumbled out of the classroom afterwards and walked off towards their sports practice still talking animatedly about the subject of their lesson. Talk about engagement! But why should this be surprising? A yearning for the infinite seems to be a universal human trait and the new curriculum is allowing it to be expressed and given a vocabulary. Interest in the course is spreading. We have already had enquiries about the use of the curriculum from schools in Australia and the UK.  

A benefit of this new approach is that RE no longer seen as peripheral to a whole education but takes a more central role. The topics are sometimes broadly philosophical, (how do I know what is true? What do I do with failure? ), so of course are pivotal to everything else that is learned. Students are developing tools for critical thinking and the integration of ideas which make them better students, and, I would expect, better people.

This weekend past I was in Wellington at a small workshop writing units for the Theology Curriculum. Anne Van Gend, the head of the Anglican Schools Office and the brains and the driving force behind the project was there of course, and her Presbyterian equivalent, Sharon Ross Ensor. The other 5 people present were all RE teachers who were using the new material. We met in the Home of Compassion in Island Bay and together produced 3 more units. It was a busy weekend, but it wasn't a chore, as all of us so enjoyed what we were doing. It was helpful to me to have the input of experienced teachers. A similar group will meet again sometime next year and the work of development will continue. This is a project which has the potential to be transformative for our schools and for the church. It is already being transformative for some of our children.


Comments

Jennie Lewis said…
Can we have some of the lessons/units for our Youth Groups in churches too, please? How would we access a chance to trial them?
Kelvin Wright said…
Hi Jennie. I have a great deal of sympathy for your request, but I’m sorry to say we won’t be able to release units or individual lesson plans for while yet. The reasons for this are that the curriculum is, as yet, only about half written. Even after writing we are being diligent about monitoring, gaining feedback and revising. We are trying to be as supportive to those who are teaching it as we can, and this is possible when they are all part of our quite well developed network of chaplains, principals and RE teachers. In a small number of the lessons there is copyright material kindly gifted to us by other organisations. The development of the curriculum does of course come at a cost, and this is being borne by the Anglican Schools Office, which in turn is funded by the Anglican schools, who therefore own the material. The material isn’t just a bunch of lessons but it is a curriculum in which the various parts build on each other, and will, when finished form a coherent pattern of teaching stretching over 4 years and designed to fit within a New Zealand secondary educational framework. Those overseas schools who plan to use it are expecting to pay us royalties in recognition of the costs of development. For these reasons we would be reluctant to let parts of it out into the public domain. Perhaps when it is finished, a version for use in churches could be considered.

Popular posts from this blog

Camino, by David Whyte

This poem captures it perfectly Camino. The way forward, the way between things, the way already walked before you, the path disappearing and re-appearing even as the ground gave way beneath you, the grief apparent only in the moment of forgetting, then the river, the mountain, the lifting song of the Sky Lark inviting you over the rain filled pass when your legs had given up, and after, it would be dusk and the half-lit villages in evening light; other people's homes glimpsed through lighted windows and inside, other people's lives; your own home you had left crowding your memory as you looked to see a child playing or a mother moving from one side of a room to another, your eyes wet with the keen cold wind of Navarre. But your loss brought you here to walk under one name and one name only, and to find the guise under which all loss can live; remember you were given that name every day along the way, remember you were greeted as such, and you neede

Kindle

 Living as I do in a place where most books have to come a long way in an aeroplane, reading is an expensive addiction, and of course there is always the problem of shelf space. I have about 50 metres of shelving in my new study, but it is already full and there is not a lot of wall space left; and although it is great insulation, what is eventually going to happen to all that paper? I doubt my kids will want to fill their homes with old theological works, so most of my library is eventually going to end up as egg cartons. Ebooks are one solution to book cost and storage issues so I have been  using them for a while now, but their big problem has been finding suitable hardware to read them on.  I first read them on the tiny screens of Ipaqs and they were quite satisfactory but the wretchedness of Microsoft Reader and its somewhat arbitrary copyright protection system killed the experience entirely. On Palm devices they were OK except the plethora of competing and incompatible formats

Ko Tangata Tiriti Ahau

    The Christmas before last our kids gave us Ancestry.com kits. You know the deal: you spit into a test tube, send it over to Ireland, and in a month or so you get a wadge of paper in the mail telling you who you are. I've never, previously, been interested in all that stuff. I knew my forbears came to Aotearoa in the 1850's from Britain but I didn't know from where, exactly. Clemency's results, as it turns out, were pretty interesting. She was born in England, but has ancestors from various European places, and some who are Ngāti Raukawa, so she can whakapapa back to a little marae called Kikopiri, near Ōtaki. And me? It turns out I'm more British than most British people. Apart from a smattering of Norse  - probably the result of some Viking raid in the dim distant past - all my tūpuna seem to have come from a little group of villages in Nottinghamshire.  Now I've been to the UK a few times, and I quite like it, but it's not home: my heart and soul belon

En Hakkore

In the hills up behind Ranfurly there used to be a town, Hamilton, which at one stage was home to 5,000 people. All that remains of it now is a graveyard, fenced off and baking in the lonely brown hills. Near it, in the 1930s a large Sanitorium was built for the treatment of tuberculosis and other respiratory ailments. It was a substantial complex of buildings with wards, a nurses hostel, impressive houses for the manager and superintendent and all the utility buildings needed for such a large operation. The treatment offered consisted of isolation, views and weather. Patients were exposed to the air, the tons of it which whistled past, often at great speed, the warmth of the sun and the cold. They were housed in small cubicles opening onto huge glassed verandas where they cooked in the summer and froze in the winter and often, what with the wholesome food and the exercise, got better. When advances in antibiotics rendered the Sanitorium obsolete it was turned into a Borstal and the

Return to Middle Earth

 We had a flood, a couple of weeks back, and had to move all the stuff out of the spare bedroom, including  the contents of two floor to ceiling book cases. Shoving the long unopened copies of Sartor Resartus and An Introduction to Byron into cartons, I came upon my  copy of The Lord of the Rings . Written in the flyleaf are the dates of its many readings, the last one being when I read it aloud to Catherine, when she was about 10 or 11, well over 20 years ago. The journey across Middle Earth took Catherine and me the best part of a year, except for the evening when we followed Frodo and Sam across the last stretches of Mordor and up Mount Doom, when we simply couldn't stop, and sat up reading until 11.00 pm, on a school night.  My old copy is a paperback, the same edition that every card carrying baby boomer has somewhere on their shelves. The glue has dried and hardened. The cover and many of the pages have come loose. I was overcome with the urge to read it again, but this old