Skip to main content

Becoming

This morning I watched an extraordinary half hour conversation between Jordan Peterson and Iain McGilchrist. I have previously reviewed McGilchrist's The Master and His Emissary, a book which has profoundly influenced my thinking on cognition and behaviour. It was a priviliege to listen to these two influential men discussing the brain, freedom and choice, good and evil, chaos and order, mythology, being, and becoming. I was bowled over by something that McGilchrist said late in the interview, when discussing his yet to be finished new book that "God is becoming," and here the word "becoming" is a noun, not a verb.

I am well used to thinking of God as Being. Since my days in San Francisco Theological Seminary, I have prescribed to the view that there are no things, but rather processes, and that the Universe and all it contains is in process. I have long been grateful to Charles Birch for clarifying for me the term purpose,with regard to the universe, and helping me understand how the seemingly random process of evolution can be purposed without being directed or preordained. I am grateful to David Bohm for his ideas of the implicate and explicate order, and for giving a scientific undergirding to the idea of the unity of the Universe. And here in this simple phrase, McGilchrist pulled it all succinctly together.

So, the process of the rose's reproduction involves this particular flow of energy, the movement from bud to flower, which is fast enough for me to witness and slow enough for me to capture in a photograph. This single rose which is a part of a bigger process - the plant - which is itself part of bigger and more encompassing processes which include, ultimately, me, and my thoughts about it and these words I write. And you, as you read them.

Photo: Nikon D7100; Micro Nikkor 105 F4; 1/160 f7.1; iso200 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Yes creation constantly, and miraculousy, coming into being, simultaneously arising and manifest. And the intrinsic nature of it?

I'm a big fan of St Julian of Norwich.

...Truth sees God, and wisdom contemplates God, and from these two comes a third, a holy and wonderful delight in God, who is love...

...God is love everlasting and eternal...

The inexpressible wonder of consciousness of a consciousness posessing spiritual creativity. Wondrous enough that there is anyrhing here at all in the first instance, and inexpressible that the intrinsic nature of it is as St Julian of Norwich witnesses. Her shrinein Norwich UK got bombed in the war then rebuilt,and still retains an atmosphere.Mysteries of the universe!
Kelvin Wright said…
Hi. Thanks for your insights.

My brother lived in Norfolk for a while and I visited St. Julian's cell on a couple of occasions. As you say, it has a profound atmosphere,despite the room being a modern recreation. Some things are more powerful than mere bricks and mortar. Norfolk isn't short of holy places. Walsingham is odd but in it's own way quite a transformative place. And theres St William of Norwich. And of course the beautiful cathedral and its impressive close.
Alden Smith said…
The musings of these two learned gentlemen was very interesting to listen to and the follow up possibilities endless. I will do some reading.

I find the idea of ‘God as process’ intriguing yet paradoxically both enlightening and limiting - in a similar way to the Buddhist concept of ‘Non Self’.

In the Buddhist context the question arises as to what exactly is observing the state of ‘Non Self’? Who or what experiences this state. An answer based on notions or feelings from subjective mystical experience is not an answer that fits within the linguistic framework in which we discuss these ideas.

In terms of the idea of ‘God is Process’ and Process being a noun, it is a useful concept to be put alongside all the other nouns relating to God - Love, Truth, Justice, Mercy, Alpha and Omega etc, etc. We can examine the process - but it doesn’t bring us any closer to the idea as to why there is something rather than nothing. What use is the Cosmos to Omnipotence? Would not ‘God as Process’ be a form of Pantheism.

Kelvin Wright said…
I find Meister Eckhart's concept of The Ground helpful in helping in think about Non Self. The ground is the "place" where observation is made from,(note the inverted commas. We're at the edge of language here) and cannot therefore be observed itself, any more than you can bite your teeth. It is not the self (which can be observed) and so can't easily fit the term often used of True Self, as opposed to False Self.Our ground, says Meister Eckhart is God's ground, though he strongly emphasises that we are not God.

He also says that God is no-thing. The trouble is we determinedly make God into a thing, and in some senses have to if we want to conceptualise and talk about God. So God as prime mover, Lord, Father, The Alpha and the Omega, all these are things - some of them admittedly very fancy and sophisticated things, nonetheless. Our linguistic tangles over God usually come because we have confined God to thingness and are caught in the various paradoxes which then arise. Process is also a thing, I suppose, and so I've got to be very careful in how I apply that term. But roughly, how I see it is:

The universe is a process and every "thing" in it is also a process. Or rather, a smaller part of the greater process. Everything is in a state of flux and change, but things which change slower than we do seem to be permanent and we can be deluded into thinking they are eternal. Not so - they are in process. It is all a great flow as Heraclitus said. So the questions we ask about the universe are things like: is the flow going somewhere? Is it purposeful? How did it begin? Where and when will it end? Why am I part of it? Why am I aware enough to even ask all these damn silly questions? "God" is the answer we give to all these. That is not to say God is some big thing who has set all this going, and is busy manning (sic) the pumps to keep the flow happening. That is not to say that God has a great master plan and we are all slavishly following along as the universe is moulded into the great preordained pattern. That is not to say that the universe and God are the same things. But the process of change itself; the great movement; the flow; the path of redemption and transformation which I see in my own soul - these are the beginning of the universe. ie these are God.

"The force that through the green fuse drives the flower
Drives my green age; that blasts the roots of trees
Is my destroyer.
And I am dumb to tell the crooked rose
My youth is bent by the same wintry fever.

The force that drives the water through the rocks
Drives my red blood; that dries the mouthing streams
Turns mine to wax.
And I am dumb to mouth unto my veins
How at the mountain spring the same mouth sucks."

I will be queuing up, elbowing old ladies out of the line, to get my copy of McGilchrist's new book the instant he finishes writing it, but in the meantime I'm finding Whitehead and the Process theologians very helpful.

Popular posts from this blog

Camino, by David Whyte

This poem captures it perfectly Camino. The way forward, the way between things, the way already walked before you, the path disappearing and re-appearing even as the ground gave way beneath you, the grief apparent only in the moment of forgetting, then the river, the mountain, the lifting song of the Sky Lark inviting you over the rain filled pass when your legs had given up, and after, it would be dusk and the half-lit villages in evening light; other people's homes glimpsed through lighted windows and inside, other people's lives; your own home you had left crowding your memory as you looked to see a child playing or a mother moving from one side of a room to another, your eyes wet with the keen cold wind of Navarre. But your loss brought you here to walk under one name and one name only, and to find the guise under which all loss can live; remember you were given that name every day along the way, remember you were greeted as such, and you neede

Kindle

 Living as I do in a place where most books have to come a long way in an aeroplane, reading is an expensive addiction, and of course there is always the problem of shelf space. I have about 50 metres of shelving in my new study, but it is already full and there is not a lot of wall space left; and although it is great insulation, what is eventually going to happen to all that paper? I doubt my kids will want to fill their homes with old theological works, so most of my library is eventually going to end up as egg cartons. Ebooks are one solution to book cost and storage issues so I have been  using them for a while now, but their big problem has been finding suitable hardware to read them on.  I first read them on the tiny screens of Ipaqs and they were quite satisfactory but the wretchedness of Microsoft Reader and its somewhat arbitrary copyright protection system killed the experience entirely. On Palm devices they were OK except the plethora of competing and incompatible formats

Ko Tangata Tiriti Ahau

    The Christmas before last our kids gave us Ancestry.com kits. You know the deal: you spit into a test tube, send it over to Ireland, and in a month or so you get a wadge of paper in the mail telling you who you are. I've never, previously, been interested in all that stuff. I knew my forbears came to Aotearoa in the 1850's from Britain but I didn't know from where, exactly. Clemency's results, as it turns out, were pretty interesting. She was born in England, but has ancestors from various European places, and some who are Ngāti Raukawa, so she can whakapapa back to a little marae called Kikopiri, near Ōtaki. And me? It turns out I'm more British than most British people. Apart from a smattering of Norse  - probably the result of some Viking raid in the dim distant past - all my tūpuna seem to have come from a little group of villages in Nottinghamshire.  Now I've been to the UK a few times, and I quite like it, but it's not home: my heart and soul belon

En Hakkore

In the hills up behind Ranfurly there used to be a town, Hamilton, which at one stage was home to 5,000 people. All that remains of it now is a graveyard, fenced off and baking in the lonely brown hills. Near it, in the 1930s a large Sanitorium was built for the treatment of tuberculosis and other respiratory ailments. It was a substantial complex of buildings with wards, a nurses hostel, impressive houses for the manager and superintendent and all the utility buildings needed for such a large operation. The treatment offered consisted of isolation, views and weather. Patients were exposed to the air, the tons of it which whistled past, often at great speed, the warmth of the sun and the cold. They were housed in small cubicles opening onto huge glassed verandas where they cooked in the summer and froze in the winter and often, what with the wholesome food and the exercise, got better. When advances in antibiotics rendered the Sanitorium obsolete it was turned into a Borstal and the

Return to Middle Earth

 We had a flood, a couple of weeks back, and had to move all the stuff out of the spare bedroom, including  the contents of two floor to ceiling book cases. Shoving the long unopened copies of Sartor Resartus and An Introduction to Byron into cartons, I came upon my  copy of The Lord of the Rings . Written in the flyleaf are the dates of its many readings, the last one being when I read it aloud to Catherine, when she was about 10 or 11, well over 20 years ago. The journey across Middle Earth took Catherine and me the best part of a year, except for the evening when we followed Frodo and Sam across the last stretches of Mordor and up Mount Doom, when we simply couldn't stop, and sat up reading until 11.00 pm, on a school night.  My old copy is a paperback, the same edition that every card carrying baby boomer has somewhere on their shelves. The glue has dried and hardened. The cover and many of the pages have come loose. I was overcome with the urge to read it again, but this old