Skip to main content

Revisiting

On St Clair beach is a group of old pilings. When I first bought a decent (for the time) digital camera I photographed them and made a picture I was happy with. Way back then,  I took the picture at dusk, used a tripod, set the lens to a narrow aperture to get as much depth of field as possible, and used a slow shutter speed (around 20 seconds) to smooth out the water.  I've visited the pilings many times, and made much the same shot. Last night I realised that the tide and the light were appropriate for yet another iteration, and took the picture above. Same settings, though the old wooden logs have aged a bit.

We revisit our past. It's not now as we imagined it. Things that seemed so strong and straight are succumbing to the tides of the universe, as everything does. 

The piles have suffered the indignities of all that is constant in their environment. They are still lovely in their decline, though, and make their own statement about impermanence and the movement we all make from being to nothingness.

Technical stuff. Nikon D750. Nikkor 16-35 @ f22, 22 seconds, iso100



Comments

BrianR said…
Christians do not move "from being to nothingness". "For we know that if the tent which is our earthly home is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens.... He who has prepared us for this very thing is God, who has given us the Spirit as a guarantee' (2 Corinthians 5.1,5)
Kelvin Wright said…
Everything in the universe traces the same journey. It is not, it is, it is not again. Everything, each atom, each sub atomic particle, each star, each planted and all that planet contains, each civilisation - all follow at path of non existence, existence then non existence. When God wanted to give us a picture of all things he gave us Jesus, whose life followed that pattern. But of course there was something else he demonstrated, which is also always there in the universe: resurrection. When things cease to be it isn’t an ending but the start of something else.

And so I believe it will be with me. One day, probably sooner rather than later, Kelvin Wright will cease to be. But there will be resurrection. Something else will begin (and I would guess - will follow the same pattern. But what would I know? What would anybody know about that, various proof texting of our favourite theories notwithstanding). What, exactly the continuity will be between what I am and what I will be after death I have no idea. I don’t think you have any idea either.
BrianR said…
Disappointing comment, Kelvin, and pretty far from Christian orthodoxy. Actually it sounds closer to Hindu ideas of reincarnation (and its offshoot Buddhism) than what Paul tells us in Romans 8 and 1 Corinthians 15, and what our Lord says in the Gospels about the Resurrection of the dead and the Last Judgment. The New Testament and the words of Christ give us a clearer picture than your agnosticism because they understand human beings to be spiritual as well as physical (body and soul). Eternal life does not mean a Nietzschean eternal recycling plant. It means attaining the same kind of life that our Risen Lord has attained. So no, I don't follow your agnosticism.
Kelvin Wright said…
Wow. My blog post is 10 lines long. I make a further nine line response. In this I say that all things die. I say that beyond our personal death there is something else, the shape of which is hard to discern. From this, you have deduced that I subscribe to a Nietzchean recycling machine, that I am unorthodox, that I am closer to Hinduism than Christianity, and that I am agnostic, that I don’t believe that human beings have a body, mind and soul. Brian, I don’t know how to respond to you. Your lack of even the tiniest engagement with what I have said, your speed at labelling me and then condemning me because you disapprove of the label you have attached to me... all mean that discussion is, for me, pretty much impossible.
BrianR said…
Kelvin, I respect that you printed a comment you disagree with. That's a generous liberalism. My first comment was a response to your claim about "the movement we all make from being to nothingness". "Nothingness" denotes - to me, at least - non-existence, which is not what the Bible and the Catholic faith and creeds say about human beings at death. I am not sure what you actually believe about personal eschatology because your style is poetic, allusive and a little sweeping in its generalisations, and far from "the tiniest engagement with what [you] have said", I was responding to them from the perspective of biblical and Catholic orthodoxy. To wit:
"Everything in the universe traces the same journey. It is not, it is, it is not again. Everything, each atom, each sub atomic particle, each star, each planted and all that planet contains, each civilisation - all follow at path of non existence, existence then non existence." - Actually matter doesn't cease to exist, it just gets re-ordered. First law of general thermodynamics.
"When God wanted to give us a picture of all things he gave us Jesus, whose life followed that pattern. But of course there was something else he demonstrated, which is also always there in the universe: resurrection. When things cease to be it isn’t an ending but the start of something else."
- Jesus' body didn't disintegrate or 'cease to be', it was transformed into a glorified, eternal state. Resurrection is *not "always there is the universe". The cycle of spring and nature or the formation of new stars through gravity has nothing to do with the resurrection of Christ, which is a supernatural invasion of natural processes. Pagan Roman religion (think of Horace: 'Diffugerunt nives ...') was greatly moved by the cycle of the seasons but saw the destiny of man to be oblivion, but the Jewish-Christian faith took an entirely different direction.

"And so I believe it will be with me. One day, probably sooner rather than later, Kelvin Wright will cease to be." - Really? Is the death of the body the end of the person? Are the dead in Christ not with God, experiencing the Father's love and awaiting the resurrection, as the Church has always understood the word of Christ and His apostles? What did Paul mean in Philippians 1.23, 'I desire to depart and be with Christ, which is better by far'?

"But there will be resurrection. Something else will begin (and I would guess - will follow the same pattern. But what would I know? What would anybody know about that, various proof texting of our favourite theories notwithstanding)." - But as I said above, 'resurrection' is a Christian word. It means the discontinuity with the pattern of nature, which is toward decay and death. It is also a repudiation of Hindu-Buddhist beliefs in karma and reincarnation, which have no part of Christian theology.
"What, exactly the continuity will be between what I am and what I will be after death I have no idea. I don’t think you have any idea either."
- Well, I do have ideas from my reading of the New Testament, the Church Fathers, Aquinas and the Reformers. I submit that the Great Tradition is rather more solid than your agnosticism or uncertainty on this question. Of course, if the Great Tradition is wrong, then so am I.

Popular posts from this blog

Camino, by David Whyte

This poem captures it perfectly Camino. The way forward, the way between things, the way already walked before you, the path disappearing and re-appearing even as the ground gave way beneath you, the grief apparent only in the moment of forgetting, then the river, the mountain, the lifting song of the Sky Lark inviting you over the rain filled pass when your legs had given up, and after, it would be dusk and the half-lit villages in evening light; other people's homes glimpsed through lighted windows and inside, other people's lives; your own home you had left crowding your memory as you looked to see a child playing or a mother moving from one side of a room to another, your eyes wet with the keen cold wind of Navarre. But your loss brought you here to walk under one name and one name only, and to find the guise under which all loss can live; remember you were given that name every day along the way, remember you were greeted as such, and you neede

Kindle

 Living as I do in a place where most books have to come a long way in an aeroplane, reading is an expensive addiction, and of course there is always the problem of shelf space. I have about 50 metres of shelving in my new study, but it is already full and there is not a lot of wall space left; and although it is great insulation, what is eventually going to happen to all that paper? I doubt my kids will want to fill their homes with old theological works, so most of my library is eventually going to end up as egg cartons. Ebooks are one solution to book cost and storage issues so I have been  using them for a while now, but their big problem has been finding suitable hardware to read them on.  I first read them on the tiny screens of Ipaqs and they were quite satisfactory but the wretchedness of Microsoft Reader and its somewhat arbitrary copyright protection system killed the experience entirely. On Palm devices they were OK except the plethora of competing and incompatible formats

Ko Tangata Tiriti Ahau

    The Christmas before last our kids gave us Ancestry.com kits. You know the deal: you spit into a test tube, send it over to Ireland, and in a month or so you get a wadge of paper in the mail telling you who you are. I've never, previously, been interested in all that stuff. I knew my forbears came to Aotearoa in the 1850's from Britain but I didn't know from where, exactly. Clemency's results, as it turns out, were pretty interesting. She was born in England, but has ancestors from various European places, and some who are Ngāti Raukawa, so she can whakapapa back to a little marae called Kikopiri, near Ōtaki. And me? It turns out I'm more British than most British people. Apart from a smattering of Norse  - probably the result of some Viking raid in the dim distant past - all my tūpuna seem to have come from a little group of villages in Nottinghamshire.  Now I've been to the UK a few times, and I quite like it, but it's not home: my heart and soul belon

En Hakkore

In the hills up behind Ranfurly there used to be a town, Hamilton, which at one stage was home to 5,000 people. All that remains of it now is a graveyard, fenced off and baking in the lonely brown hills. Near it, in the 1930s a large Sanitorium was built for the treatment of tuberculosis and other respiratory ailments. It was a substantial complex of buildings with wards, a nurses hostel, impressive houses for the manager and superintendent and all the utility buildings needed for such a large operation. The treatment offered consisted of isolation, views and weather. Patients were exposed to the air, the tons of it which whistled past, often at great speed, the warmth of the sun and the cold. They were housed in small cubicles opening onto huge glassed verandas where they cooked in the summer and froze in the winter and often, what with the wholesome food and the exercise, got better. When advances in antibiotics rendered the Sanitorium obsolete it was turned into a Borstal and the

Return to Middle Earth

 We had a flood, a couple of weeks back, and had to move all the stuff out of the spare bedroom, including  the contents of two floor to ceiling book cases. Shoving the long unopened copies of Sartor Resartus and An Introduction to Byron into cartons, I came upon my  copy of The Lord of the Rings . Written in the flyleaf are the dates of its many readings, the last one being when I read it aloud to Catherine, when she was about 10 or 11, well over 20 years ago. The journey across Middle Earth took Catherine and me the best part of a year, except for the evening when we followed Frodo and Sam across the last stretches of Mordor and up Mount Doom, when we simply couldn't stop, and sat up reading until 11.00 pm, on a school night.  My old copy is a paperback, the same edition that every card carrying baby boomer has somewhere on their shelves. The glue has dried and hardened. The cover and many of the pages have come loose. I was overcome with the urge to read it again, but this old